From 4800e25a741198a6b1758cf6b17f8ed89552bebb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Taylor R Campbell Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 04:36:46 +0000 Subject: Use `let*' rather than `let' in `paredit-indent-sexps'. Ignore-this: 18cf22cb9511351b0d547a2337357c96 There is no semantic difference here in elisp, since elisp guarantees left-to-right evaluation order in `let', but using `let*' makes it clearer that there is an intended ordering dependency. darcs-hash:20110323043646-00fcc-fddfd7cf6d1d67eea90fa03627a510d7c82432b4 --- paredit.el | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'paredit.el') diff --git a/paredit.el b/paredit.el index 76e16bb..01aacb3 100644 --- a/paredit.el +++ b/paredit.el @@ -2459,8 +2459,8 @@ Assumes that `paredit-in-string-p' is false, so that it need not handle (defun paredit-indent-sexps () "If in a list, indent all following S-expressions in the list." - (let ((start (point)) - (end (paredit-handle-sexp-errors (progn (up-list) (point)) nil))) + (let* ((start (point)) + (end (paredit-handle-sexp-errors (progn (up-list) (point)) nil))) (if end (indent-region start end)))) -- cgit v1.2.1