Use `let*' rather than `let' in `paredit-indent-sexps'.

Ignore-this: 18cf22cb9511351b0d547a2337357c96

There is no semantic difference here in elisp, since elisp guarantees
left-to-right evaluation order in `let', but using `let*' makes it
clearer that there is an intended ordering dependency.

darcs-hash:20110323043646-00fcc-fddfd7cf6d1d67eea90fa03627a510d7c82432b4

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/paredit.el b/paredit.el
index 76e16bb..01aacb3 100644
--- a/paredit.el
+++ b/paredit.el
@@ -2459,8 +2459,8 @@ Assumes that `paredit-in-string-p' is false, so that it need not handle
 
 (defun paredit-indent-sexps ()
   "If in a list, indent all following S-expressions in the list."
-  (let ((start (point))
-        (end (paredit-handle-sexp-errors (progn (up-list) (point)) nil)))
+  (let* ((start (point))
+         (end (paredit-handle-sexp-errors (progn (up-list) (point)) nil)))
     (if end
         (indent-region start end))))